About
LAW AND HEALTH
For a summary of topics covered in this blog go to “Welcome to Law and Health”
*******************
Valerie Eliot Smith
Please note that, as of September 2022, whilst I continue to follow events in the ME community, I rarely take on any new advocacy/assistance work
I am a British barrister, now retired for reasons of age and health. I was called to the Bar of England and Wales in 1987 and I completed pupillage. My areas of interest are the law, health and media relations. My legal expertise is in technology, media and telecomms law (TMT), human rights, open justice, data protection/privacy and freedom of information. I also practised as a criminal lawyer for ten years.
My background also includes experience in communications and media strategy with an international public relations firm, dispute resolution, psychotherapy and human resources. My first degree was in English Literature, in 1977, from the University of London (Bedford College). My primary education took place in Australia.
I have lived with the complex, disabling, multi-systemic, neuro-immune disease myalgic encephalomyelitis or “ME” since 1981. ME is sometimes referred to (incorrectly – see below in “Definition of ME“) as “chronic fatigue syndrome” or “CFS”. I continued to work, study and practise as a lawyer until 2000 when I was further disabled by additional health problems. I have been unable to work in any formal capacity since then.
I completed a one-year Certificate in Psychotherapy and Counselling in 2002 but became too ill to continue the necessary two-year training course thereafter.
From 2015 to 2025, I was a Visiting Scholar at the Centre for Commercial Law Studies at Queen Mary, University of London, in order to extend my academic background. However, I have been unable to continue with any formal qualifications as I was never well enough for long enough to complete the research, writing and teaching requirements.
********************
Independent and non-practising status
The views expressed in this blog are my own. I am not affiliated to any other group or professional body relating to ME or “CFS” issues. I receive no payment for any of my work and I cover all costs incurred myself.
I am a lifetime member of Gray’s Inn, my Inn of Call, and registered with the Bar Council. My status with the Bar Council is “unregistered” which means non-practising. Non-practising members of the Bar are registered officially by the Bar Council as “unregistered”, a designation which defies both logic and common sense.
********************
Contact details
I can be contacted via email at valerie@valerieeliotsmith.com or by leaving a comment on any blog post.
I will always respond as soon as I am able, depending on the state of my health at the time.
********************
Definition of ME
For clarification purposes: the definition of ME which I prefer is contained within the 2011 International Consensus Criteria (the “ME-ICC”). While I have no wish to exclude those who are diagnosed under other criteria, for me the ME-ICC is the most appropriate definition we have so far, for both clinical and research purposes.
As a result of more than four decades of experience, observation and research, I regard chronic fatigue syndrome as a condition which is separate from ME. The terms “CFS/ME” and “ME/CFS” are frequently used interchangeably with ME, with CFS and with each other, adding to the confusion and misdiagnosis and frustrating attempts at gathering accurate data.
There are many other names in use eg. post-viral fatigue syndrome (PVFS), post-acute infection syndrome (PAIS), systemic exertion intolerance disease (SEID) and now, arguably, some cases of long covid. This confuses matters even further.
It is very likely that there is frequent cross-misdiagnosis of ME and CFS ie. people with ME are diagnosed with CFS and vice versa. This may depend, at least in part, on which country the patient is located. Both under and over-diagnosis are also problematic.
This wide range of terminology is both confusing and imprecise. Additionally, the different criteria used for research purposes confounds the production of reliable and accurate results.
In England and Wales, the 2021 NICE guideline NG206 for the diagnosis and management of “ME/CFS” [sic] is operative.
********************
Purpose of this blog
I originally started this blog in 2012 in order to publish my work on the so-called “Secret Files on ME“. However, since then, I have broadened its scope, researching, recording and analysing the development of ME’s torturous history and politics – past, present and future (see “CATEGORIES” in sidebar).
I also examine some of the reasons why we are still without proper recognition, treatment or cure, nearly a century on from the first recorded outbreak of an ME-like illness in 1934, and what we should consider doing differently in order to change the narrative around the illness.
Comments
I welcome comments and my policy is simple: please keep it clear, relevant and lawful. All comments are now moderated so it may take a little time before they appear. Personal attacks on anyone are not welcome and, in extremis, may not get through moderation. I will respond as and when I can, depending on my own state of health at the time.
Acknowledgments
If you are making use of information or documents from this blog, please quote this blog as your source and credit my work accordingly.
Disclaimer
Nothing in this blog should be taken as either legal or medical advice. I strive to ensure that everything I say is accurate and not misleading but if you think I’ve got something wrong then please let me know. Broken links happen and information becomes out of date so, while I try to keep the blog up to date, inevitably some things get overlooked.
********************************
Trackbacks
- Professor Garner, The BMJ and me: an alarming flip-flop on recovery from long Covid | valerieeliotsmith
- Beyond the NICE guideline: MEComms© and the case for a public inquiry | valerieeliotsmith
- NICE – contemptuous and contemptible: the case for community publication of the “paused” guideline for “ME/CFS” | valerieeliotsmith
- Update on the “paused” NICE guideline for “ME/CFS”: the case for individual/community publication. | valerieeliotsmith
- A debt of gratitude | valerieeliotsmith
- Legal opinion and legal advice: the “paused” NICE guideline for “ME/CFS” | valerieeliotsmith
- Abuse of process & abuse of power: a NICE publication (with file download) | valerieeliotsmith
- The leak of NICE’s finalised ME guidelines exposes the ‘psych lobby’ scandal – Critical News Autoblog
- What’s wrong with the NICE process + what can be done about it? | valerieeliotsmith
- NICE developments: preparatory action for a judicial review of the decision to pause publication of the new guideline for “ME/CFS” | valerieeliotsmith
- NICE shows transparency, releases documents ahead of 18 October roundtable + a note on parliamentary activity | valerieeliotsmith
- NICE publishes updated guideline for “ME/CFS” | valerieeliotsmith
- FOI requests reveal that NICE caved in response to threats from psychiatric lobby in “ME/CFS” debacle | valerieeliotsmith
- 🌍 Much ado about a lot
- NICE publishes updated guideline for “ME/CFS” | On Eagles Wings
- Complaint dismissed: a charitable error or failure of due process? | valerieeliotsmith
- Governance under scrutiny: identities revealed in charity complaint | valerieeliotsmith
- A manifesto for change: from strategy to inquiry | valerieeliotsmith
- Limitation of Consent to Treatment: template form + Guidance Notes (with downloads) | valerieeliotsmith
- Dialogues for a neglected illness – Equalities @ EECS
- Looking “Beyond the Hype”: does this book contain defamatory material? | valerieeliotsmith
- The Poisoned Well: a history of ME in 20 tweets | valerieeliotsmith
- TEN YEARS ON: “Somewhere Towards the End”* | valerieeliotsmith
- Spotlight on ME/CFS: Who is lobbying whom? – Part one – The ME Global Chronicle
M.E sufferers were voice recorded by Lancaster & Fleetwood M.P Cat Smith . With sufferers permission could their personal horror stories regarding GET be used by anyone bringing legal action . It seems a wasted opportunity not to use these testimonies as they were recorded before recent legal action and would be back up to individual claims . Obviously their is written evidence but real voices would hit home that GET disables lives .
LikeLike